By Peter Fraser
(This is an archived article written by NES' Co-Founder, Peter Fraser)
I woke up suddenly at 3:30 am and put another blanket on my bed, as it was getting to nine degrees Celsius or below.
After that, I suddenly remember that, two weeks before, when Harry had visited me upon his return from filming with Professor Popp in Germany, he told me he had been tested in Professor Popps’ laboratory for photon emissions.
The results were that he was emitting high-energy radiation, due no doubt to some exposure he had experienced.
I had put that exposure down at the time to air travel, where there is often a huge exposure to X-rays.
Of course, Harry was concerned, so I tested him for the radiation and found that this was true, since he matched with the sample I have on hand of Energetic Integrator 18.
The Integrators in the NES system clinicians use go from EI 1 to EI 12, which is where our system for correcting the body-field stops.
But in theory the system can be extended to the end of the electromagnetic spectrum, which of course must end when the wavelength gets to infinitely small distances.
This will occur at greater than 1024 Hertz.
Harry had radiation within the range of 1018 Hertz.
This is very high energy X-ray radiation.
So, I gave him ES-1, the Infoceutical correlated to exposure to radiation of all types.
He also ate a lot of seaweed to help deal with it.
But that night, when I woke up, I suddenly wondered why I had never tested the CT pictures of rings in the brain that I had been given by Richard Flook, a few months back, for matching to radiation.
It sounds crazy to try to match anything to a picture, instead of to the actual brain matter, but it works fine.
Pictures actually “encode” an energy image that is sent into the surrounding space, in the form of photons. That is one theory.
I prefer Milo Wolff’s space resonance theory as an explanation, where the electron In and Out waves intersect to influence a structure in space, in this case the structure in space encoded by the photograph of the CT scan showing the rings.
When this happens, structures in space are “firmed” by the intersection of the In wave and the object.
I got up and conducted the matching test to see if the rings on the various CT scan photographs matched any of the higher EIs. I found that EI 17 was not a match. Neither was EI 18, or EI 19. . . .
I didn’t find matches.
So I was left wondering about something else: How can people have a radiation spot deep inside their brains? Why and how does it appear?
This seemed to me like a complete mystery at first. In fact, the evening before I had gone looking for information on CT scans, to find out at least what I was supposed to think.
There is always an official line of thinking, which often covers up what is really happening!
The CT scan literature on the Internet, in places like Wikipedia, is like that sometimes: we are looking at what people are doing when they think defensively, rather than creatively!
The makers of the CT scanning devices want to make the device look as fail-proof and accurate as possible for radiologists, which is their market.
So they are obliged to explain all the streaks, lines, smudges, and even concentric rings that appear in the final images, which are computer-generated images of actual deep-body tissues.
What are these streaks, lines and rings to the manufacturers?
They are described as “artifacts” of the imaging process, which means they shouldn’t be there, no one wants them there, and they are not “real,” but we can’t avoid them as they result from the very complex hardware and software processes as imaging errors.
In the case of the ring artifacts, however, they appear so regularly in the popular third-generation of CT scanners that they have to be accounted for, or at least not ignored.
The official explanation of these rings is that there are stresses and perhaps misalignments or even damage to the receptor devices inside the CT scan.
But we know that this technology is very old, was tested for seven years before it was initially released, and since then it has been continually refined, so there has been plenty of time for technological advancements that could address, and get rid of, the ring “artifacts.”
It’s no surprise there is no mention of this in Wikipedia!
Let’s have a quick review of the device...
The CT scanner emits X-rays across a circular doughnut in which the person being imaged rests.
X-rays are shot across the doughnut and there are, opposite each emitter, or emission point, a receptor for X-rays, of which there may be from 250 to 1000.
The ring artifacts supposedly originate in these receptors. But do they?
If you have a “rat detector,” as you need to have when studying science and carrying it out, you have to wonder how we know that some things are real whereas other things are not.
My rat detector flipped out because I had learned (from the work of Ryke Hamer, for instance) that the positions of these rings correspond to disease sites in a patient.
In other words, someone like Hamer could look at the CT scan, note the position of the rings and determine where in the body a disease might be expressing itself.
But conventional radiologists ignore this or don’t even know about it.
According to convention, these rings in the images result from software glitches associated with the reconstruction of the picture of the tissue of the body.
But if you pay attention to how the rings change over time in patients who get multiple CT scans, they look like something completely different.
For example, sometimes a ring becomes crinkly and then begins to fade over time, which correlates to the patient improving!
In addition, there are images of strange calcium rings where the original rings had once been once the client is cured of a disease.
So, if these rings are not real, then something odd indeed is going on!
The rings behave as if they are real, if you are looking at them from the point of view of clinical analysis.
A ring (of course it is really a sphere seen in two dimensions) is the most perfect shape in nature, and is in appearance quite unlike the streaks and lines and other flack that you get from electronics “noise.”
Rings/spheres are a sign of order in nature, not of disorder.
Here is my point.
There are most certainly artifacts in a CT scan that represent disorder.
But these rings/spheres are not evidence of disorder. As Einstein said, we can only see the things that fit into our paradigm.
So it is not surprising that some radiologists cannot agree that the rings are real simply because these rings do not fit into their radiology paradigm.
They do, however, fit another paradigm—with astrophysicist Milo Wolff’s space resonance theory (also called the wave structure of matter theory).
Formulated in the mid 1980s, Wolff’s theory hinges on spherical waves that form as standing waves in space and whose interactions (interference patterns) actually give rise to the information and energy that inform matter.
In fact that’s what matter really is—the oscillations of spherical standing wave patterns.
But this theory is beyond the scope of conventional radiologists, and so it doesn’t play into their reality, even when they are presented with the evidence from the CT scans.
So what does this have to do with a theory of cancer?
Considering that it is possible that cancer clients have huge amounts of energy stored in standing waves in their brains, it would not be surprising that it takes months and months for this energy to be discharged as heat.
Physicists tell us that the higher the frequency, the more the energy.
Some alternative therapists working with cancer patients try to break up the energy in the rings in the brain to get the cancer to regress.
That makes logical sense, but it doesn’t go far enough.
NES would take another approach.
Remember, in the NES Energetic Integrator system we have a frequency-like range over which the system stretches, appearing to end at 1012, which is where we find correlations to the spleen and pancreas.
However, my research takes us further, into another 12 EIS, although these EIs are not used in the clinical setting.
There appear to be EIs the go to 1024. However, there are few matches between these high EIs and the body or body-field.
There are a few matches to organs and tissues at EI 13, 14, and 15, but after that, at the highest energy levels of the EI system, there are no matches between the body-field and the body at all, as I said at the beginning of this article.
So how can it be that a sick person can show rings in the brain that evidently match with very high gamma-ray energy?
We can surmise that when physical problems are associated with very high energies, such as gamma rays, the body-field has gone crazy.
The body-field has become severely over-energized.
When a person goes to have a CT scan, the already high energy is further energized by exposure to the X-ray, which is considerable in a CT scan.
(Which is why CT scans might better be left for emergencies rather than normal, run-of-the-mill diagnosis, although each person’s situation will dictate the decision.)
Now we have to ask the question, how it is that the body or the body-field can generate such amazing amounts of high energy radiation that they can be detected by a CT scan as a standing wave?
Let’s look at physics as well as electronics.
In electronics, you can generate a frequency that generates an oscillator, or a system or set of systems that move in rhythmic, coordinated ways.
But when these oscillations get out of control, they go to higher and higher frequencies.
You have all heard of this phenomenon.
For example, when an amplifier becomes unstable, it begins to oscillate and the result is feedback, usually of only the very high range of sound.
If the oscillation gets far out of control, the amplifier overheats and actually breaks down. Things begin to melt inside the amplifier from the heat.
How then can we get this sort of feedback or uncontrolled oscillation going on in the human body or body-field?
It’s not so difficult actually. All you need are two pathways in conflict.
This is how feedback begins in an amplifier.
There are multiple pathways set up in space for the sound (energy) of the output of the amplifier.
You can control it by changing the position of objects near the speakers. In the brain, you need only two pathways of energy that begin to do much the same thing.
The neuropsychologists call this a conflict of emotions.
Conflict of emotions can set off this oscillation effect that appears to result in over- energization of the specific relay points in the brain that correlate to the organ associated with each emotion.
You can’t ever just have one set of rings in your brain; there always must be two.
Neuropsychologists have already discovered, decades ago, that many emotions have a “favored” part of the body, an aspect of the body that is most affected or susceptible to the effects of that emotional turmoil.
Ancient traditions, such as the Chinese, also said as much.
Now we can incorporate this knowledge, and all the information from CT scans and the body-field that I have just mentioned, in our theory of the body-field in a very specific way.
We can even imagine a new theory of cancer, although because of the complexity of the causes and effects we do not attempt to “treat” cancer.
In NES, of course, we do not treat the body at all or concern ourselves with disease or symptomology.
But understanding something new about the possible bioenergetics of cancer, which takes so many forms and expressions in the body, is reason enough to celebrate.
(This is an archived article written by NES' Co-Founder, Peter Fraser)
I woke up suddenly at 3:30 am and put another blanket on my bed, as it was getting to nine degrees Celsius or below.
After that, I suddenly remember that, two weeks before, when Harry had visited me upon his return from filming with Professor Popp in Germany, he told me he had been tested in Professor Popps’ laboratory for photon emissions.
The results were that he was emitting high-energy radiation, due no doubt to some exposure he had experienced.
I had put that exposure down at the time to air travel, where there is often a huge exposure to X-rays.
Of course, Harry was concerned, so I tested him for the radiation and found that this was true, since he matched with the sample I have on hand of Energetic Integrator 18.
The Integrators in the NES system clinicians use go from EI 1 to EI 12, which is where our system for correcting the body-field stops.
But in theory the system can be extended to the end of the electromagnetic spectrum, which of course must end when the wavelength gets to infinitely small distances.
This will occur at greater than 1024 Hertz.
Harry had radiation within the range of 1018 Hertz.
This is very high energy X-ray radiation.
So, I gave him ES-1, the Infoceutical correlated to exposure to radiation of all types.
He also ate a lot of seaweed to help deal with it.
But that night, when I woke up, I suddenly wondered why I had never tested the CT pictures of rings in the brain that I had been given by Richard Flook, a few months back, for matching to radiation.
It sounds crazy to try to match anything to a picture, instead of to the actual brain matter, but it works fine.
Pictures actually “encode” an energy image that is sent into the surrounding space, in the form of photons. That is one theory.
I prefer Milo Wolff’s space resonance theory as an explanation, where the electron In and Out waves intersect to influence a structure in space, in this case the structure in space encoded by the photograph of the CT scan showing the rings.
When this happens, structures in space are “firmed” by the intersection of the In wave and the object.
I got up and conducted the matching test to see if the rings on the various CT scan photographs matched any of the higher EIs. I found that EI 17 was not a match. Neither was EI 18, or EI 19. . . .
I didn’t find matches.
So I was left wondering about something else: How can people have a radiation spot deep inside their brains? Why and how does it appear?
This seemed to me like a complete mystery at first. In fact, the evening before I had gone looking for information on CT scans, to find out at least what I was supposed to think.
There is always an official line of thinking, which often covers up what is really happening!
The CT scan literature on the Internet, in places like Wikipedia, is like that sometimes: we are looking at what people are doing when they think defensively, rather than creatively!
The makers of the CT scanning devices want to make the device look as fail-proof and accurate as possible for radiologists, which is their market.
So they are obliged to explain all the streaks, lines, smudges, and even concentric rings that appear in the final images, which are computer-generated images of actual deep-body tissues.
What are these streaks, lines and rings to the manufacturers?
They are described as “artifacts” of the imaging process, which means they shouldn’t be there, no one wants them there, and they are not “real,” but we can’t avoid them as they result from the very complex hardware and software processes as imaging errors.
In the case of the ring artifacts, however, they appear so regularly in the popular third-generation of CT scanners that they have to be accounted for, or at least not ignored.
The official explanation of these rings is that there are stresses and perhaps misalignments or even damage to the receptor devices inside the CT scan.
But we know that this technology is very old, was tested for seven years before it was initially released, and since then it has been continually refined, so there has been plenty of time for technological advancements that could address, and get rid of, the ring “artifacts.”
It’s no surprise there is no mention of this in Wikipedia!
Let’s have a quick review of the device...
The CT scanner emits X-rays across a circular doughnut in which the person being imaged rests.
X-rays are shot across the doughnut and there are, opposite each emitter, or emission point, a receptor for X-rays, of which there may be from 250 to 1000.
The ring artifacts supposedly originate in these receptors. But do they?
If you have a “rat detector,” as you need to have when studying science and carrying it out, you have to wonder how we know that some things are real whereas other things are not.
My rat detector flipped out because I had learned (from the work of Ryke Hamer, for instance) that the positions of these rings correspond to disease sites in a patient.
In other words, someone like Hamer could look at the CT scan, note the position of the rings and determine where in the body a disease might be expressing itself.
But conventional radiologists ignore this or don’t even know about it.
According to convention, these rings in the images result from software glitches associated with the reconstruction of the picture of the tissue of the body.
But if you pay attention to how the rings change over time in patients who get multiple CT scans, they look like something completely different.
For example, sometimes a ring becomes crinkly and then begins to fade over time, which correlates to the patient improving!
In addition, there are images of strange calcium rings where the original rings had once been once the client is cured of a disease.
So, if these rings are not real, then something odd indeed is going on!
The rings behave as if they are real, if you are looking at them from the point of view of clinical analysis.
A ring (of course it is really a sphere seen in two dimensions) is the most perfect shape in nature, and is in appearance quite unlike the streaks and lines and other flack that you get from electronics “noise.”
Rings/spheres are a sign of order in nature, not of disorder.
Here is my point.
There are most certainly artifacts in a CT scan that represent disorder.
But these rings/spheres are not evidence of disorder. As Einstein said, we can only see the things that fit into our paradigm.
So it is not surprising that some radiologists cannot agree that the rings are real simply because these rings do not fit into their radiology paradigm.
They do, however, fit another paradigm—with astrophysicist Milo Wolff’s space resonance theory (also called the wave structure of matter theory).
Formulated in the mid 1980s, Wolff’s theory hinges on spherical waves that form as standing waves in space and whose interactions (interference patterns) actually give rise to the information and energy that inform matter.
In fact that’s what matter really is—the oscillations of spherical standing wave patterns.
But this theory is beyond the scope of conventional radiologists, and so it doesn’t play into their reality, even when they are presented with the evidence from the CT scans.
So what does this have to do with a theory of cancer?
Considering that it is possible that cancer clients have huge amounts of energy stored in standing waves in their brains, it would not be surprising that it takes months and months for this energy to be discharged as heat.
Physicists tell us that the higher the frequency, the more the energy.
Some alternative therapists working with cancer patients try to break up the energy in the rings in the brain to get the cancer to regress.
That makes logical sense, but it doesn’t go far enough.
NES would take another approach.
Remember, in the NES Energetic Integrator system we have a frequency-like range over which the system stretches, appearing to end at 1012, which is where we find correlations to the spleen and pancreas.
However, my research takes us further, into another 12 EIS, although these EIs are not used in the clinical setting.
There appear to be EIs the go to 1024. However, there are few matches between these high EIs and the body or body-field.
There are a few matches to organs and tissues at EI 13, 14, and 15, but after that, at the highest energy levels of the EI system, there are no matches between the body-field and the body at all, as I said at the beginning of this article.
So how can it be that a sick person can show rings in the brain that evidently match with very high gamma-ray energy?
We can surmise that when physical problems are associated with very high energies, such as gamma rays, the body-field has gone crazy.
The body-field has become severely over-energized.
When a person goes to have a CT scan, the already high energy is further energized by exposure to the X-ray, which is considerable in a CT scan.
(Which is why CT scans might better be left for emergencies rather than normal, run-of-the-mill diagnosis, although each person’s situation will dictate the decision.)
Now we have to ask the question, how it is that the body or the body-field can generate such amazing amounts of high energy radiation that they can be detected by a CT scan as a standing wave?
Let’s look at physics as well as electronics.
In electronics, you can generate a frequency that generates an oscillator, or a system or set of systems that move in rhythmic, coordinated ways.
But when these oscillations get out of control, they go to higher and higher frequencies.
You have all heard of this phenomenon.
For example, when an amplifier becomes unstable, it begins to oscillate and the result is feedback, usually of only the very high range of sound.
If the oscillation gets far out of control, the amplifier overheats and actually breaks down. Things begin to melt inside the amplifier from the heat.
How then can we get this sort of feedback or uncontrolled oscillation going on in the human body or body-field?
It’s not so difficult actually. All you need are two pathways in conflict.
This is how feedback begins in an amplifier.
There are multiple pathways set up in space for the sound (energy) of the output of the amplifier.
You can control it by changing the position of objects near the speakers. In the brain, you need only two pathways of energy that begin to do much the same thing.
The neuropsychologists call this a conflict of emotions.
Conflict of emotions can set off this oscillation effect that appears to result in over- energization of the specific relay points in the brain that correlate to the organ associated with each emotion.
You can’t ever just have one set of rings in your brain; there always must be two.
Neuropsychologists have already discovered, decades ago, that many emotions have a “favored” part of the body, an aspect of the body that is most affected or susceptible to the effects of that emotional turmoil.
Ancient traditions, such as the Chinese, also said as much.
Now we can incorporate this knowledge, and all the information from CT scans and the body-field that I have just mentioned, in our theory of the body-field in a very specific way.
We can even imagine a new theory of cancer, although because of the complexity of the causes and effects we do not attempt to “treat” cancer.
In NES, of course, we do not treat the body at all or concern ourselves with disease or symptomology.
But understanding something new about the possible bioenergetics of cancer, which takes so many forms and expressions in the body, is reason enough to celebrate.
